Julius Caesar Essay: The Character of Brutus -- Julius Caesar Essays

The Character of Brutus in Julius Caesar Et tu Brute? Caesars simple statement sums up Brutus round character in the development of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus was thought to represent no threat due to his nobility and his loyalty however, these qualities are precisely wherefore the story is such a catastrophe. What stemmed from these traits is the last expected outcome. Caesars surprise was so immense, he could only mutter these last few words. Brutus direct nobility, his loyal patriotism, and his nave and idealistic manner define Shakespeares tragic hero. Honor is an underlying foundation of Brutus and can be clearly seen during the plays dramatic speeches. Brutus himself makes his honor apparent in his orations. After the assassination of Caesar and during the funeral speech, Brutus asks the people of Rome, Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? If any, express for him I have offended(act III, sc ii, ln 29-32). This in Brutus proves he is noble as he cares and protects the welfare of the people and Rome as a whole. He is torn between his sense of duty with Rome and his friendship with Caesar. In the end however, he must rationalize his actions to save face and conform to both(prenominal) sides of his conflict. Furthermore, Brutus tries to prove his nobility to virtually everyone. When Brutus utters his last words, he tells Caesar his intentions, I killed thee with half so good a will(act V, sc v, ln 50-51). His honor is always retentive and never fails to prevail at even the most taxing and awkward situation. Brutus considers his honor in every aspect and choice in his life and a lot rules over his own accord. Accordingly, many people, including his enemies, were very m... ...t categorized with his honor, his loyalty to Rome, and his naive and idealistic disposition. Works Cited Bloom, Harold. William Shakespeares Julius Caesar. Chelsea House Publisher Connecticut, New York, & Pennsylvania. 1988, Pg. 33 - 36 Boyce, Charles. Sha kespeare A to Z. Roundtable Press, Inc. New York. 1990, Pg. 78 - 80 Durband, Alan. Shakespeare Made Easy Julius Caesar. Barrons Educational Series, Inc. New York. 1985. Ludowyk, E.F.C. Understanding Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press New York. 1962, Pg. 184 - 187 Morner, Kathleen & Rausch, Ralph. NTCs Dictionary of Literary Terms. National textual matter Company Illinois. 1991, Pg. 225 - 227 Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. Dover Publications, Inc. New York. 1991. http//student.cscc.edu/ENGL/Engl264/traglex.htm. Shakespearean Tragedy. 11-29-01. Yahoo.

Auschwitz Concentration Camp :: essays research papers

Auschwitz     EVEN IN THE SILENCE OF THE POLISH countryside, Auschwitz can not rest in peace. The relate alone prompts instant recognition--a shorthand for the criminal barbarity of the 20th century. If ever there were a place in which allegory was unseemly and unnecessary, where fact could be left unadorned, it would be Auschwitz. For 50 years, that has not been the case.      The list of myths and misconceptions about the largest Nazi concentration camp is a long one. Soviet investigators decl atomic number 18d in whitethorn 1945 that 4 million people had died in Auschwitz, and the rarify Communist authorities stuck to this inflated figure until they lost power in 1989. Since then the number has heen revise to between 1.1 million and 1.5 million, which most historians now believe is accurate. Until the Soviet bloc fell, the exhibits at Auschwitz downplayed the number of Jewish victims, suggesting that their part of the rack up was smalle r than the 90 pct figure generally accepted today. In the West, many erroneously believed that the camp was created to murder Jews, and that Auschwitz was the primary killing ground for Polish Jews. The facts are more complex.      A former army barracks located near the town of Oswiecim, or Auschwitz in German, the main camp received its first guide of 728 Poles in June 1940. These were policy-making prisoners, usually affiliated with resistance movements. In most cases, they were Catholics, since the deportations of Jews had not yet begun. But as soon as those first prisoners arrived, they were treated to a speech that signaled the coming(prenominal) evolution of the camp. "You have come not to a sanatorium but to a German concentration camp where the provided way out is by means of the chimney," Karl Fritsch, the SS chief in charge of the prisoners, declared. "If someone doesnt like it, he can throw himself on the barbed wire. If there are J ews in the transport, they dont have the accountability to live more than two weeks priests, one month, and the others, three months."      "The camp was created to destroy the most valuable part of Polish society, and the Germans partially succeeded in this," says Zygmunt Gaudasinski, an early political prisoner there. Some prisoners, like Guadasinskis father, were shot torture was commonplace, and the early mortality rate was very high. That changed once prisoners latched onto jobs--in the kitchens, warehouses and other supply places--which increased their odds for survival.Auschwitz Concentration Camp essays research papers Auschwitz     EVEN IN THE SILENCE OF THE POLISH countryside, Auschwitz can not rest in peace. The name alone prompts instant recognition--a shorthand for the criminal barbarity of the 20th century. If ever there were a place in which myth was unseemly and unnecessary, where fact could be left unadorned, it would be Auschwitz. For 50 years, that has not been the case.      The list of myths and misconceptions about the largest Nazi concentration camp is a long one. Soviet investigators declared in May 1945 that 4 million people had died in Auschwitz, and the Polish Communist authorities stuck to this inflated figure until they lost power in 1989. Since then the number has heen revised to between 1.1 million and 1.5 million, which most historians now believe is accurate. Until the Soviet bloc fell, the exhibits at Auschwitz downplayed the number of Jewish victims, suggesting that their part of the total was smaller than the 90 percent figure generally accepted today. In the West, many erroneously believed that the camp was created to murder Jews, and that Auschwitz was the primary killing ground for Polish Jews. The facts are more complex.      A former army barracks located near the town of Oswiecim, or Auschwitz in German, the main camp recei ved its first transport of 728 Poles in June 1940. These were political prisoners, usually affiliated with resistance movements. In most cases, they were Catholics, since the deportations of Jews had not yet begun. But as soon as those first prisoners arrived, they were treated to a speech that signaled the future evolution of the camp. "You have come not to a sanatorium but to a German concentration camp where the only way out is through the chimney," Karl Fritsch, the SS chief in charge of the prisoners, declared. "If someone doesnt like it, he can throw himself on the barbed wire. If there are Jews in the transport, they dont have the right to live more than two weeks priests, one month, and the others, three months."      "The camp was created to destroy the most valuable part of Polish society, and the Germans partly succeeded in this," says Zygmunt Gaudasinski, an early political prisoner there. Some prisoners, like Guadasinskis fath er, were shot torture was commonplace, and the early mortality rate was very high. That changed once prisoners latched onto jobs--in the kitchens, warehouses and other sheltered places--which increased their odds for survival.