Leader case study on Steve Jobs Essay

app bent motion 1EXPLAIN HOW each OF THE tail fin ELEMENTS OF OUR DEFINITION OF LEADERSHIP APPLIES TO STEVE JOBS LEADING apple?As delimitate by Mr. Achua lead is the influencing process of attracters and chase to succeed organizational objectives do change. He defined trenchant attraction to be mortal who have the five chemical elements of attractership as menti whizd in the above bet. Mr. Steve Jobs has been a full(a) example of being an effective attracter for apple. The five elements in his personality be discussed as play alongs_INFLUENCE_Influencing is the process of a leader communicating ideas, gaining acceptance of them, and motivating following to support and implement the ideas by means of change. Mr. Jobs has been a perfect example for this element. He has squ atomic number 18 up non just his employees as salubrious as his customers by produceing innovational products that his customers want. agree to the fiber the tidy sum who leftoverfiel d orchard apple tree says though Jobs hogs the credit save theyve never d champion better operation. This is how influenced his populate from him. They were loyal and gave Mr. Jobs smashing respect._ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES_Effective leaders influence followers to theorise not only of their own interests unless to a fault of the interest of the organization finished a circumstancesd hatful. Mr. Jobs didnt think more or less his own interests while working in orchard apple tree, the example of him hiring John Scuelly to bring professional person management into power in gravel of himself is a prove, that he wanted his association to grow. It was his vision that make the companies he worked for a supremacy._CHANGE_There is no doubt if it is give tongue to that change was the most important element that Mr. Steve had for being an effective leader. orchard apple tree has been a perfect example of change and it was only possible because of Mr. Jobs. Discussing the frat ernitys think unlike advertising campaign, Isaacson writes, They debated the grammatical result If different was supposed to modify the verb think, it should be an adverb, as in think other than. only when Jobs insisted that he wanted different to be utilize as a noun, as in think victory or think beauty. This shows that he always wanted to be different and unique. broadside supply in any role said that Jobs did things differently and its magical. correspond to the case Jobs wanted to bring about change, took innovative risk.1 http//www. pertlyyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2012/10/apple- later on-steve- hire outs.html_PEOPLE_ leading is about lead-in battalion. As per the case Jobs had been a contr each(prenominal) oversial framing in business. masses who have worked for Jobs over the age have mixed reactions to his leading people. Some c altogether him temperamental, aggressive, tough, intimidating, and very demanding. He has been hold outn to verb bothy attack pe ople who excite mistakes and atomic number 18 not conflict goals and expectations. Yet, employees who perform up to expectation are good rewarded. Even many who feared him besides had great respect for him as he did inspire loyalty, enthusiasm, and high levels of performance through continuous innovation. Even people who left Apple say its much(prenominal) brutal and Jobs hogs the credit, but theyve never done better work. consequently they intend to follow him._LEADER FOLLOWERS_An effective leader needs to share his ideas and listen to others and implement their ideas to be effective. It is receivable to Mr. Jobs steady-going training that Apple is unperturbed working well. When Mr. Job was sick subscribe in 2004 and2009, Mr. Tim puddle (present chief operating officer of Apple) was stipulation his position and through Mr. Jobs guidance he ran the family. He made his follower the succeeding(a) leader and trained him well for the job. concord to the case while work ing with the jut out team, he employ to take enter from the followers into what is designed and how. Mr. Jobs always stimulate loyalty, enthusiasm and high levels of performance through continuous innovation from his followers.QUESTION 2IDENTIFY LEADERSHIP ROLES PLAYED BY JOBS AS chief executive officer OF APPLE. WHICH ROLE WAS THE more or less IMPORTANT?Figure 1 Leadership Managerial Roles by Henry MintzbergThe traits of all managerial references defined by Mintzberg weed been seen in Mr. Jobs being the leader of Apple. simply the most important role that he vie was being an entrepreneur that comes downstairs decisional role. Following are the roles that he played while leading Apple_FIGURE HEAD_Mr. Jobs performed the front role for Apple when he employ to represent the organization. He utilise to cast announcement for the dive of products, acted with the customers. Signing functionary documents, entertaining clients or customers as formal representatives. He use d to give stand firm interviews. He in addition used to informally talk to people and attend external meetings as an organizational representative._LEADER_Mr. Jobs played the leader role that is of performing the management functions to in effect operate the managers organization unit. According to the case he made decision for hiring professional management. He used to do instruct and give instructions to design plane section specifically. He used to confront people if the performance of employees falls but also used toreward them if they performed well._MONITOR_Mr. Jobs performed the monitor role when he used to gather discipline for innovative products, to discover problems and opportunities, and to under(a)stand events out-of-door the organizational unit. He was a perfectionist. He used to monitor everything very closely. According to the case he was obsessive CEO who wanted his product to be a great deal perfect in every way. He was the one who stop the launch of one of Apple right before the launch date to be sure its perfect._DISSEMINATOR_Steve also played a disseminator role when he used to work with the design team. When some information indispensable to be transferred to the employees. When Mr. Cook become active agent CEO in 2009, Steve used to work on decisions and convey them to him to bring it into action._SPOKESPERSON_Mr. Steve was a great spokesperson for Apple. He used to interact with people outside organization through seminars, meetings and interviews. The reason why people know him really well is, he used to speak to the public on behalf of Apple._ENTREPRENEUR_Steve Jobs is one of the silk hat entrepreneurs. Through self-assessment he accomplished that his strengths was in developing reinvigorated products. He believed the future of Apple depends on the general product introduction and transition. His vision for Apple made him a great entrepreneur. post horse Gates also called him to be grotesque with intuitive taste. H e does thing differently and it was magical in the eye of Bill Gates._DISTURBANCE HANDLER_Steve performed the disturbance-handler role of leading when he took tonic action when the gild was about to quiver bankrupt. According to the case Jobs saved the company in a way that is not seen in the history of Silicon Valley. Hence it proves him being a disturbance handler._RESOURCE ALLOCATOR_Steve was also a resource distributer when he used to appoint people in teams and to work they were good at. He allocated Sculley to be the CEO is an e.g of resource allocator._NEGOTIATOR_He was a great negotiator. He used to make people convince about his ideas. People were so influenced by him that they said none of them has done better work than him. sensation of the reason was he was a good negotiator.QUESTION 3WHICH LEVEL OF compendium IS THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF THIS CASE?The patriarchal centre of the case is to have an compend of oneself i.e self-assessment. Discovering what a person is g ood at can make him reach high targets of life. As Steve Jobs did his self-assessment and did it right he knew he was good at making new and innovative products, so he pore all his attention in doing this job which made him succeed. Doing the job you enjoy and are good at is the key for travel development and reaching the top of mastery ladder. He had a clear vision in his mind for himself and Apple which made him a great leader. So doing self-assessment and having a clear vision is the primary focus of this case.QUESTION 4EXPLAIN HOW EACH OF THE LEADERSHIP THEORY CLASSIFICATION APPLIES TO THIS CASE, AND WHICH ace IS THE MOST RELEVANT?A leadership supposition is an explanation of some case of leadership theories have practical rank because they are used to better understand, predict, and temper successful leadership. Leadership theory classifications acknowledge trait, behavioral, contingence, and integrative. Following is the explanation how all these prevail to the cas e_LEADERSHIP TRAIT_ theories endeavour to excuse classifiable characteristics accounting for leadership effectiveness. Researchers analyzed strong-arm and psychological traits, or qualities, such as high energy level, appearance, aggressiveness, self-reliance, persuasiveness, and dominance in an effort to identify a caboodle of traits that all successful leaders possessed. According to the case Steve Jobs was also a person he was aggressive, very demanding, tough and intimidating. He always showed high level of energy._BEHAVIORAL LEADERSHIP_ theories attempt to explain distinctive styles used by effective leaders, or to define the constitution of their work.Mintzbergs ten managerial roles are an example of behavioral leadership theory. This theory applies in the case by discussing different examples that showed Steve Jobs to be an effective leader. As discussed in the question 2, Steve had showed almost all the managerial roles of being an effective leader when required. He had been an entrepreneur by introducing innovative products. He has been a spokesperson and a figure head for Apple. A resource allocator when he gave the CEO position to Sculley. A leader when he had to launch new products in a perfect way. A disturbance handler when he telephone Apple back to the place that it merit and so on._CONTINGENCY LEADERSHIP_ theories attempt to explain the earmark leadership style based on the leader, followers, and situation. In other words, which traits and/or behaviors get out result in leadership success given the situational variables. Again Steve Jobs example has been used in this case to explain the contingency leadership. When he changed the culture back to entrepreneurial atmosphere. He was the man who had clear vision andunderstood the requirement of time and worked accordingly. other example that the case discuss is when he launch Pixar when working with NeXt._INTEGRATIVE LEADERSHIP_ theories attempt to blend in the trait, behavioral, and con tingency theories to explain successful, influencing leader-follower alliances. Researchers try to explain why the followers of some leaders are willing to work so hard and make personal sacrifices to get hold of the group and organizational objectives, or how effective leaders influence the behavior of their followers. In this case it is seen when people though were not given credit of work nevertheless followed Steve and trust him blindly. He made his followers grow and they were loyal to him.After discussing all the theories, I believe that the most applicable theories to this case and Steve Jobs is _Integrative leadership_. The reason being that it contains all the rest of theories including leader follower relationship that can be seen in Steve Jobs. The case mainly highlight _Trait and Behavioral leadership theories_ aspect in Steve Jobs personality besides if he is studied in level the Integrative leadership theories can be best applied to him.QUESTION 5WHEN STEVE JOBS LEAVES APPLE AGAIN, WILL APPLES PERFORMANCE DETERIORATE AND GO keister INTO A CRISIS OF NEAR BANKRUPTCY? why OR WHY NOT?As everyone knows that Steve Jobs expired in Oct 2011, it has been 2 years that Apple is performing under Mr. Tim Cook leadership. According to the present position of Apple in the world being the best company, it can be said that Apple performance has reminded the same. One of the reason could be Steve being a great leader trained his followers so well that it help the present management to corroborate Apple position in market. Mr. Tim had been the CEO for Apple when Steve was sick and on leave. He made decision on behalf of Steve under Steve observation.So he has been trained to be the CEO and hence replaced Steve in a good way. However it wont be wrong to say that the poke of innovation and bring new products in the market is missing bethe company has introduced improved versions of the products that Steve Jobs introduced. As people are so hooked up with App le products it helps the company to sustain its position. But if the company doesnt introduce something new in brief its performance can be effected. As Apple is known for its innovation.The company late launch Apple Map App but it was a failure. The perfection element that Steve products used to have was missing in it and Google maps were much better. But if we talk about fiscal performance then yes it has improved after Steve Jobs as well.